Jody Lee

Are You A Filter Felon?


Posted On:Sep 28, 2007

The crackdown has officially begun and if you think you are excluded from risk since you only buy a couple cartons at a time, think again. 

Posted by Jody Lee
Politics and Issues Local/State
Comments (9)

Back to the blog »

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( Charlie from Kingsport ) on October 01, 2007 at 9:52 am

Empty threats I say, they don’t have the manpower to place an agent at the 15 to 20 places that sell cigarettes in Weber City alone. There’s also at least 3 major ways to get back to Tennessee from Weber City so they would have to have agents there to catch the scofflaws. I think the authorities in this case are just “blowing smoke”

Posted by ( Wayne ) on October 16, 2007 at 9:47 am

It won’t bother me if they charged 20 bucks per cigarette.  And it is truly wonderful to be able to walk in a business, any business, and now be able to breathe.  Enforcement aside, the legislature finally got one right.  The 75% non smokers say a big thank you.  Yep, just like Congress, if you let me write the tax laws guess who would not have to pay any?  Funny how that works.  And I suspect that most lawmakers, both federal and state, do not smoke.  So expect tobacco taxes to continue to increase.

Posted by ( Jody Cartier ) on October 28, 2007 at 8:06 pm

You suspect most lawmakers do not smoke?  Where in the world did you get THAT from? 

I am glad you are not bothered by the government telling the small businessman how to run his business.  Unless you are wildly shortsighted, you must be anxiously awaiting their next intrusive step - and there will be one, you can count on it.  Evidently you are also breathlessly anticipating that glorious day when privately-owned businesses are a thing of the past and the benevolent Government will be in charge of - - well, of everything. 

Actually you do not have to wait.  There are already countries out there where the government controls everything and everyone, all for your own good.  You could find one.  You could even go there. 

Just a thought.
Jody Lee

Posted by ( Wayne ) on October 29, 2007 at 12:37 pm

You seriously don’t know where I would come up with the FACT that most lawmakers don’t smoke?  And they actually pay you to write this stuff?  Wow, that’s good work if you can get it.  Wish I could get paid for that, but let me help you out with where I get my information.  According to the American Cancer Society and the Center for Disease Control approximately 21% of adult Americans smoke, leaving 79% that do not.  Then using STATISTICS (definition:  the mathematics of collecting, organizing, and interpreting numerical data, especially the analysis of population characteristics by inference from sampling) the number of lawmakers that do not smoke would be close to that of the population as a whole.  Further considering that since college graduates smoke only at a rate closer to 10%, and most lawmakers at the state and federal level would be college graduates, then logic would tell me that most lawmakers don’t smoke.  Hope I haven’t lost you but this seems quite elementary.  I’m on solid ground here, unless one is some kind of fundamentalist that doesn’t believe in science.  You know the type, the ones who believe Adam and Eve rode to church on dinosaurs. 

As to the government telling small businesses what they can and cannot do (and large businesses for that matter), that is what makes a civil society, rules and regulations and rule of law and safety regulations and other such interference in our society.  I’m old enough to remember when some businesses around town had signs saying “White Patrons Only”, which was A-O-K with the lawmaking bodies here in the South and the states rights loving judges that sat on the bench in these fine Southern States of the Old South.  Then some liberal activist judges in the federal judiciary decided that was not right and forced the change on these Southern states, much to the chagrin of the overall population here.  I would argue that we have a much better society because of that judicial activism of the federal judiciary to force businesses and people who live in the South to accept that all are created equal.  And I don’t think business has suffered because of this.  But it certainly was telling businesses how to operate which had previously been up to them and the state laws.  I really don’t see where I am anti-business by believing that the public has a right to expect smoke free air and smoke free workplaces, since it is beyond dispute that second hand smoke is hazardous to health.  Not in dispute at all. 

But I must have struck a nerve for you to suggest that perhaps I should leave my country and find another one to live in.  I believe I have as much right to live here as you do.  I was born here and am a patriotic citizen.  But maybe that is just a liberal dream too, that all citizens have a right to live in peace in this country of ours.  Yeah that’s it.  More liberal activism.

Just a thought.

Wayne

Posted by ( Jody Lee ) on November 01, 2007 at 10:18 pm

Oh, NOW I get it.  You meant that STATISTICALLY most lawmakers do not smoke.  I see.  You spoke as if you had polled them personally which, by the way, you would have to do in order to say most lawmakers do not smoke.  As far as “statistics” go, keep an eye out for an entry I will be making in the next week regarding that topic.  I’ll be anxious to get your two cents on that one!

It would also appear that the second-hand smoke argument is going to have to be unearthed again, since you are mistaken in claiming it is not in dispute.  However, that, too, is for a near-future blog.  Hold your thoughts on those two subjects, if you will, and I promise to open them up soon when we can focus on them exclusively. 

The public certainly has the right to work in a smoke-free workplace.  But unlike you, I believe the constitutional way to achieve that is for citizens to refuse to work in a business which allows smoking.  Likewise, I believe that citizens who do not wish to eat in a restaurant which allows smoking should absolutely not patronize that place.  And fortunately, they have never been forced to do so.  If society is truly as anti-smoking as you say, then businesses that allow smoking would have soon been OUT of business.  Unlike you, I do not believe it is government’s role in this case.  I believe that society will weed out these businesses on its own, without the intrusion of government.  And if it DOESN’T (and of course, it didn’t), then your assumption that this is what most citizens want must be incorrect.

Finally, I was merely offering options based on your ease of acceptance of government intrusion.  I did not mean to suggest that you SHOULD leave the country.  Only that you could.  Furthermore I have never expressed doubt about your patriotism.  Let’s not read insult and accusation into a comment in which it does not exist. 

On the other hand, I take your personal insults in stride as always.  Yes, it IS “good work” and I DID get it. 

Jody

Posted by ( drug rehab program ) on March 03, 2008 at 11:04 am

States have not yet implemented graphical cigarette warning labels, which is considered a more effective method to communicate to the public the dangers of cigarette smoking.

Posted by ( Radu ) on April 07, 2008 at 10:19 am

We could get arrested for possession of … cigarettes. So, what’s next? Well, suicide might become illegal. LOL

drug and alcoholic treatment center

Posted by ( Drug Treatment ) on June 13, 2008 at 9:57 am

This is a silly law indeed and if I want to buy cigarettes from across the border that is my problem and not the IRS’s problem… Some people just can’t think of any other methods to rip us off.

Posted by ( Felix ) on June 15, 2008 at 5:46 am

It`s not serious for my mind.

Post a comment

Please Log In

Comment posting requires free registration with TriCities.

Already have an account? Please log in.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement